<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- edited with XMLSPY v5 rel. 3 U (http://www.xmlspy.com)
     by Daniel M Kohn (private) -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
]>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-12.txt"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

  <?rfc toc="yes" ?>

  <?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>

  <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>

  <?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>

  <?rfc strict="yes" ?>

  <front>
    <title abbrev="RTCP XR Discard">RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended
    Report (XR) Block for Discard Count metric Reporting</title>

    <author fullname="Alan Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
      <organization abbrev="Telchemy">Telchemy Incorporated</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280</street>

          <city>Duluth</city>

          <region>GA</region>

          <code>30097</code>

          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>

        <email>alan.d.clark@telchemy.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Glen Zorn" initials="G." surname="Zorn">
      <organization>Network Zen</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>77/440 Soi Phoomjit, Rama IV Road</street>

          <street>Phra Khanong, Khlong Toie</street>

          <city>Bangkok</city>

          <code>10110</code>

          <country>Thailand</country>
        </postal>

        <phone>+66 (0) 87 502 4274</phone>

        <email>gwz@net-zen.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District</street>

          <city>Nanjing</city>

          <region>Jiangsu</region>

          <code>210012</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>sunseawq@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year="2013" />

    <area>Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area</area>

    <workgroup>Audio/Video Transport Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>RFC</keyword>

    <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword>

    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

    <keyword>Real Time Control Protocol</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines an RTP Control Protocol(RTCP) Extended Report
      (XR) Block that allows the reporting of a simple discard count metric
      for use in a range of RTP applications.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <section title="Discard Count Report Block">
        <t>This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in
        <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> for use in a range of RTP applications.
        The new block type supports the reporting of the number of packets
        which are received correctly but are never played out, typically
        because they arrive too late to be played out (buffer underflow) or
        too early (buffer overflow). The metric is applicable both to systems
        which use packet loss repair techniques (such as forward error
        correction <xref target="RFC5109"></xref> or retransmission <xref
        target="RFC4588"></xref>) and to those which do not.</t>

        <t>This metric is useful for identifying the existence, and
        characterizing the severity, of a packet transport problem which may
        affect users' perception of a service delivered over RTP.</t>

        <t>This block may be used in conjunction with <xref
        target="BGDISCARD"></xref> which provides additional information on
        the pattern of discarded packets. However the metric in <xref
        target="BGDISCARD"></xref> may be used independently of the metrics in
        this block.</t>

        <t>In case of Discard count Metrics Block sent together with Burst gap
        discard Metrics Block defined in <xref target="BGDISCARD"></xref> to
        the media sender or RTP based network management system, information
        carried in the discard count Metrics Block and Burst gap discard
        Metrics Block allows them calculate the some bust gap summary
        statistics, e.g., gap discard rate.</t>

        <t>The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end system
        metrics defined in <xref target="RFC6792"></xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="RTCP and RTCP XR Reports">
        <t>The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in <xref
        target="RFC3550"></xref>. <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> defined an
        extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended Report (XR).
        This document defines a new Extended Report block for use with <xref
        target="RFC3550"></xref> and <xref target="RFC3611"></xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Performance Metrics Framework">
        <t>The Performance Metrics Framework <xref target="RFC6390"></xref>
        provides guidance on the definition and specification of performance
        metrics. The RTP Monitoring Architectures <xref
        target="RFC6792"></xref> provides guideline for reporting block format
        using RTCP XR. The Metrics Block described in this document are in
        accordance with the guidelines in <xref target="RFC6390"></xref> and
        <xref target="RFC6792"></xref>.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Applicability">
        <t>This metric is believed to be applicable to a large class of RTP
        applications which use a jitter buffer.</t>

        <t>Discards due to late or early arriving packets affects user
        experience. The reporting of discards alerts senders and other
        receivers to the need to adjust their transmission or reception
        strategies. The reports allow network managers to diagnose these user
        experience problems.</t>

        <t>The ability to detect duplicate packets can be used by managers to
        detect network layer or sender behavior which may indicate network or
        device issues. Based on the reports, these issues may be addressed
        prior to any impact on user experience.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology">
      <section title="Standards Language">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
        document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
        target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>

        <t>In addition, the following terms are defined:</t>

        <t><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Received, Lost and Discarded"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />A packet shall be regarded as lost if it fails to
            arrive within an implementation-specific time window. A packet
            that arrives within this time window but is too early or late to
            be played out or thrown away before playout due to packet
            duplication or redundancy shall be regarded as discarded. A packet
            shall be classified as one of received (or OK), discarded or lost.
            The Discard Count Metric counts only discarded packets. The metric
            "cumulative number of packets lost" defined in <xref
            target="RFC3550"></xref> reports a count of packets lost from the
            media stream (single SSRC within single RTP session). Similarly
            the metric "number of packets discarded" reports a count of
            packets discarded from the media stream (single SSRC within single
            RTP session) arriving at the receiver. Another metric defined in
            <xref target="RFC5725"></xref> is available to report on packets
            which are not recovered by any repair techniques which may be in
            use. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
          </list></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Discard Count Metric Report Block">
      <t>Metrics in this block report on the number of packets discarded in
      the stream arriving at the RTP end system. The measurement of these
      metrics is made at the receiving end of the RTP stream. Instances of
      this Metrics Block refer by SSRC to the separate auxiliary Measurement
      Information block <xref target="RFC6776"></xref> which describes
      measurement Intervals in use. This Metrics Block relies on the
      measurement interval in the Measurement Information block indicating the
      span of the report and MUST be sent in the same compound RTCP packet as
      the measurement information block. If the measurement interval is not
      received in the same compound RTCP packet as this Metrics Block, this
      Metrics Block MUST be discarded.</t>

      <section title="Report Block Structure">
        <t><figure title="Figure 1: Report Block Structure">
            <artwork>
       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     BT=PDC    | I |DT |  resv.|      block length = 2         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                        SSRC of Source                         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                    number of packets discarded                |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="Definition of Fields in Discard Count Metric Report Block">
        <t><list style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Block type (BT): 8 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />A
            Discard Count Metric Report Block is identified by the constant
            PDC.<vspace blankLines="1" /> [Note to RFC Editor: please replace
            PDC with the IANA provided RTCP XR block type for this block.]
            <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Interval Metric Flag (I): 2 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />This field indicates whether the reported metric
            is an interval, cumulative, or sampled metric <xref
            target="RFC6792"></xref>. The Discard Count Metric can only be
            measured over definite intervals, and cannot be sampled.
            Accordingly, the value I=01, indicating a sampled value, MUST NOT
            be sent, and MUST be discarded when received. In addition, the
            value I=00 is reserved and also MUST NOT be sent, and MUST be
            discarded when received. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Discard Type (DT): 2bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />This field is used to identify the discard type
            used in this report block. The discard type is defined as
            follows:<list>
                <t>00: Report packet discarded or being thrown away before
                playout due to packets duplication.</t>

                <t>01: Report packet discarded due to too early to be played
                out.</t>

                <t>10: Report packet discarded due to too late to be played
                out.</t>
              </list><vspace blankLines="1" />The value DT=11 is reserved for
            future definition and MUST NOT be Sent,and MUST be discarded when
            received.<vspace blankLines="1" />An endpoint MAY report any
            combination of discard types in each reporting interval by
            including several Discard Count Metric Report Blocks in a single
            RTCP XR packet.<vspace blankLines="1" />Some systems send
            duplicate RTP packets for robustness or error resilience. This is
            NOT RECOMMENDED since it breaks RTCP packet statistics. If
            duplication is desired for error resilience, the mechanism
            described in <xref target="RTPDUP"></xref> can be used, since this
            will not cause breakage of RTP streams or RTCP statistics.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="Reserved (resv): 4 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />These bits are reserved. They MUST be set to zero
            by senders and ignored by receivers (See RFC6709 section 4.2).
            <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="block length: 16 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />The
            length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one, in
            accordance with the definition in<xref target="RFC3611"></xref> .
            This field MUST be set to 2 to match the fixed length of the
            report block. The block MUST be discarded if the block length is
            set to a different value. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="SSRC of source: 32 bits"><vspace blankLines="1" />As
            defined in Section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC3611"></xref>.<vspace
            blankLines="1" /></t>

            <t hangText="number of packets discarded: 32 bits"><vspace
            blankLines="1" />Number of packets discarded over the period
            (Interval or Cumulative) covered by this report. <vspace
            blankLines="1" />The measured value is unsigned value. If the
            measured value exceeds 0xFFFFFFFD, the value 0xFFFFFFFE MUST be
            reported to indicate an over-range measurement. If the measurement
            is unavailable, the value 0xFFFFFFFF MUST be reported. <vspace
            blankLines="1" />Note that the number of packets expected in the
            period associated with this metric (whether interval or
            cumulative) is available from the difference between a pair of
            extended sequence numbers in the Measurement Information block
            <xref target="RFC6776"></xref>, so need not be repeated in this
            block. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
          </list></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="SDP Signaling">
      <t>[RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol) <xref
      target="RFC4566"></xref> for signaling the use of XR blocks. However XR
      blocks MAY be used without prior signaling (see section 5 of
      RFC3611).</t>

      <section title="SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension">
        <t>This section augments the SDP <xref target="RFC4566"></xref>
        attribute "rtcp-xr" defined in <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> by
        providing an additional value of "xr-format" to signal the use of the
        report block defined in this document.<figure>
            <artwork>
xr-format =/ xr-pdc-block

 xr-pdc-block = "pkt-discard-count"
</artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="Offer/Answer Usage">
        <t>When SDP is used in offer-answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer
        usage defined in <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> for unilateral
        "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters applies. For detailed usage of
        Offer/Answer for unilateral parameter, refer to section 5.2 of <xref
        target="RFC3611"></xref>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For
      general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to <xref
      target="RFC3611"></xref>.</t>

      <section title="New RTCP XR Block Type value">
        <t>This document assigns the block type value PDC in the IANA " RTP
        Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry " to
        the "Discard Count Metrics Block".</t>

        <t>[Note to RFC Editor: please replace PDC with the IANA provided RTCP
        XR block type for this block.]</t>
      </section>

      <section title="New RTCP XR SDP Parameter">
        <t>This document also registers a new parameter "pkt-discard-count" in
        the " RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session
        Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry ".</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Contact information for registrations">
        <t><figure>
            <artwork>
The following contact information is provided for all 
registrations in this document:

Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)

101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu  210012
China
</artwork>
          </figure><vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>It is believed that this proposed RTCP XR report block introduces no
      new security considerations beyond those described in <xref
      target="RFC3611"></xref>. This block does not provide per-packet
      statistics so the risk to confidentiality documented in Section 7,
      paragraph 3 of <xref target="RFC3611"></xref> does not apply.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Contributors">
      <t>Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgments">
      <t>The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by
      Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin Connor, Claus
      Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi, Tom Hock,
      Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa,
      Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Raviraj, Albrecht
      Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada, Kevin Gross, Varun Singh,
      Claire Bi, Roni Even, Dan Romascanu and Jonathan Lennox.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <reference anchor="RFC2119">
        <front>
          <title abbrev="RFC Key Words">Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
          Requirement Levels</title>

          <author fullname="Scott Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
            <organization>Harvard University</organization>

            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>1350 Mass. Ave.</street>

                <street>Cambridge</street>

                <street>MA 02138</street>
              </postal>

              <phone>- +1 617 495 3864</phone>

              <email>sob@harvard.edu</email>
            </address>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="1997" />

          <area>General</area>

          <keyword>keyword</keyword>

          <abstract>
            <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to
            signify the requirements in the specification. These words are
            often capitalized. This document defines these words as they
            should be interpreted in IETF documents. Authors who follow these
            guidelines should incorporate this phrase near the beginning of
            their document: <list>
                <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
                "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
                "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described
                in RFC 2119.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>Note that the force of these words is modified by the
            requirement level of the document in which they are used.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC3611">
        <front>
          <title>RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)</title>

          <author fullname="T. Friedman" initials="T." surname="Friedman">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="R. Caceres" initials="R." surname="Caceres">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="A. Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="2003" />

          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines the Extended Report (XR) packet type for
            the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP), and defines how the use of XR
            packets can be signaled by an application if it employs the
            Session Description Protocol (SDP). XR packets are composed of
            report blocks, and seven block types are defined here. The purpose
            of the extended reporting format is to convey information that
            supplements the six statistics that are contained in the report
            blocks used by RTCP's Sender Report (SR) and Receiver Report (RR)
            packets. Some applications, such as multicast inference of network
            characteristics (MINC) or voice over IP (VoIP) monitoring, require
            other and more detailed statistics. In addition to the block types
            defined here, additional block types may be defined in the future
            by adhering to the framework that this document provides.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC4566">
        <front>
          <title>SDP: Session Description Protocol</title>

          <author fullname="M. Handley" initials="M." surname="Handley">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="V. Jacobson" initials="V." surname="Jacobson">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="C. Perkins" initials="C." surname="Perkins">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2006" />

          <abstract>
            <t>This memo defines the Session Description Protocol (SDP). SDP
            is intended for describing multimedia sessions for the purposes of
            session announcement, session invitation, and other forms of
            multimedia session initiation. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC3550">
        <front>
          <title>RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications</title>

          <author fullname="Henning Schulzrinne" initials="H."
                  surname="Schulzrinne">
            <organization>Columbia University</organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2003" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3550" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC6776">
        <front>
          <title>Measurement Identity and information Reporting using SDES
          item and XR Block</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Hunt" initials="G." surname="Hunt">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2012" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6776" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC6709">
        <front>
          <title>Design Considerations for Protocol Extensions</title>

          <author fullname="B.Carpenter" initials="B." surname="Carpenter">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="B.Aboba" initials="B." surname="Aboba">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="S.Cheshire" initials="S." surname="Cheshire">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="September" year="2012" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6709" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <reference anchor="RFC6792">
        <front>
          <title>Monitoring Architectures for RTP</title>

          <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="November" year="2012" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6792" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="BGDISCARD">
        <front>
          <title>RTCP XR Report Block for Burst Gap Discard metric
          Reporting</title>

          <author fullname="Geoff Hunt" initials="G." surname="Hunt">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="April" year="2013" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID"
                    value="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-11" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RTPDUP">
        <front>
          <title>Duplicating RTP Streams</title>

          <author fullname="Ali Begen " initials="A." surname="Begen">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="Colin Perkins" initials="C." surname="Perkins">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="March" year="2013" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="ID" value="draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-02" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC6390">
        <front>
          <title>Framework for Performance Metric Development</title>

          <author fullname="Alan Clark" initials="A." surname="Clark">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <author fullname="Benoit Claise " initials="B." surname="Claise">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="October" year="2011" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6390" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC5725">
        <front>
          <title>RTCP XR Report Block for Post-Repair Loss metric
          Reporting</title>

          <author fullname="Ali Begen" initials="A." surname="Begen">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="February" year="2010" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5725" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC4588">
        <front>
          <title>RTP Retransmission Payload Format</title>

          <author fullname="J.Rey" initials="J." surname="Rey">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2006" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4588" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC5109">
        <front>
          <title>RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error
          Correction</title>

          <author fullname="A.Li" initials="A." surname="Li">
            <organization></organization>
          </author>

          <date month="July" year="2006" />
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5109" />

        <format type="TXT" />
      </reference>
    </references>

    <section title="Metrics represented using RFC6390 Template">
      <t>RFC EDITOR NOTE: please change XXXX in [RFCXXXX] by the new RFC
      number, when assigned.</t>

      <t><list style="letters">
          <t>Number of packets discarded Metric<vspace blankLines="1" /><list
              style="symbols">
              <t>Metric Name: Number of RTP packets discarded Metric<vspace
              blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Metric Description: Number of RTP packets discarded over the
              period covered by this report.<vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Method of Measurement or Calculation: See section 3.2, number
              of packets discarded definition [RFCXXXX].<vspace
              blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Units of Measurement: See section 3.2, number of packets
              discarded definition [RFCXXXX].<vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
              section 3, 1st paragraph [RFCXXXX]. <vspace
              blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Measurement Timing: See section 3, 1st paragraph [RFCXXXX]
              for measurement timing and section 3.2 [RFCXXXX] for Interval
              Metric flag. <vspace blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Use and applications: See section 1.4 [RFCXXXX].<vspace
              blankLines="1" /></t>

              <t>Reporting model: See RFC3611.<vspace blankLines="1" /></t>
            </list></t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="Change Log">
      <t>Note to the RFC-Editor: please remove this section prior to
      publication as an RFC.</t>

      <section title="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-12">
        <t>The following are the major changes compared to previous
        version:<list style="symbols">
            <t>Incorporate some changes to burst gap draft that applies to
            this document.</t>

            <t>Use RFC6390 template to the metrics in the appendix.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11">
        <t>The following are the major changes compared to previous
        version:<list style="symbols">
            <t>Editorial change t based on SDP Directorate and Colin's
            Review.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10">
        <t>The following are the major changes compared to previous
        version:<list style="symbols">
            <t>Editorial change to get in line with recently discussed
            drafts.</t>

            <t>Remove DT=3 based on the discussion to summary statistics
            draft.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-09">
        <t>The following are the major changes compared to previous
        version:<list style="symbols">
            <t>SDP Duplicated Parameter Deleting.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-08">
        <t>The following are the major changes compared to previous
        version:<list style="symbols">
            <t>Outdated reference update.</t>

            <t>Editorial changes based on comments that applied to PDV and
            Delay drafts.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
